Charities do great work that changes lives and givers big
and small want to support them to do this. But behind that great work is lots
of far less interesting things that have to happen. Someone needs to do the
payroll; insurance needs to be renewed; minibuses taken for their MOTs; risk assessments
and plans written; databases need to be maintained.
Charities all say that it is hard to raise money for their
core costs yet many grants exclude them. Full cost recovery and compacts try to
address this but often charities have to find ways to package their overheads
into their project costs to get them covered.
Or they spend precious time away from the frontline to gather
unrestricted funding from events and sales.
As our understanding of magpies has changed, maybe we should
learn from this and be more magpie. Rather than just funding the attractive
work that gives us those shiny case studies. Perhaps we should find reward in funding
what the charity wants and needs. So why is that more funders and philanthropists
don’t willingly fund the photocopier service contract, the admin worker or the
office cleaner when they might be dull but are so vital?
No comments:
Post a Comment